« It's about Orchestra . . . but it's still useful! | Main | The "Who's Next" Theory »

April 22, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345238cc69e200e551f3223c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Effective Public Relations:

Comments

Rachel Todd

Great post. I currently work for a company 2 days a week therefore it is hard to keep up the momentum without doing it in a concentrated effort as you suggest. Although it is hard to explain this to people who think any coverage is good coverage.

Adam

Rachel,

One way you could try to tackle the "any coverage" problem is to change the equation.

It's not "any coverage is good coverage". It's "any coverage" OR "good coverage."

What good coverage means is different for every organization but for my job, a large theatre in Chicago, good coverage could be define as any coverage that makes the case why people should see our show versus the 200 other theatre options they have.

Like I said, the definition of good coverage for your client may vary.

You could explain to them that good coverage is what sells product. Any coverage just reminds them that the product exists.

So if they want to sell, then they should consider allowing you to focus your effots.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by TypePad